Standards for the Use of Enteral Nutrition in Patients with Diabetes or Stress Hyperglycaemia: Expert Consensus.

(1) Background: Hyperglycaemia that occurs during enteral nutrition (EN) should be prevented and treated appropriately since it can have important consequences for morbidity and mortality. However, there are few quality studies in the literature regarding the management of EN in this situation. The objective of this project was to attempt to respond, through a panel of experts, to those clinical problems regarding EN in patients with diabetes or stress hyperglycaemia (hereinafter referred to only as hyperglycaemia) for which we do not have conclusive scientific evidence; (2) Methods: The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method, a modified Delphi panel method, was applied. A panel of experts made up of 10 clinical nutrition specialists was formed, and they scored on the appropriateness of EN in hyperglycaemia, doing so in two rounds. A total of 2992 clinical scenarios were examined, which were stratified into five chapters: type of formula used, method of administration, infusion site, treatment of diabetes, and gastrointestinal complications. (3) Results: consensus was detected in 36.4% of the clinical scenarios presented, of which 23.7% were deemed appropriate scenarios, while 12.7% were deemed inappropriate. The remaining 63.6% of the scenarios were classified as uncertain; (4) Conclusions: The recommendations extracted will be useful for improving the clinical management of these patients. However, there are still many uncertain scenarios reflecting that the criteria for the management of EN in hyperglycaemia are not completely standardised. More studies are required to provide quality recommendations in this area.

Recommendations Based on Evidence by the Andalusian Group for Nutrition Reflection and Investigation (GARIN) for the Pre- and Postoperative Management of Patients Undergoing Obesity Surgery.

In order to develop evidence-based recommendations and expert consensus for nutrition management of patients undergoing bariatric surgery and postoperative follow-up, we conducted a systematic literature search using PRISMA methodology plus critical appraisal following the SIGN and AGREE-II procedures. The results were discussed among all members of the GARIN group, and all members answered a Likert scale questionnaire to assess the degree of support for every recommendation. Patients undergoing bariatric surgery should be screened preoperatively for some micronutrient deficiencies and treated accordingly. A VLCD (Very Low-Calorie Diet) should be used for 4-8 weeks prior to surgery. Postoperatively, a liquid diet should be maintained for a month, followed by a semi-solid diet also for one month. Protein requirements (1-1.5 g/kg) should be estimated using adjusted weight. Systematic use of specific multivitamin supplements is encouraged. Calcium citrate and vitamin D supplements should be used at higher doses than are currently recommended. The use of proton-pump inhibitors should be individualised, and vitamin B12 and iron should be supplemented in case of deficit. All patients, especially pregnant women, teenagers, and elderly patients require a multidisciplinary approach and specialised follow-up. These recommendations and suggestions regarding nutrition management when undergoing bariatric surgery and postoperative follow-up have direct clinical applicability.

The Effects of Bariatric Surgery-Induced Weight Loss on Adipose Tissue in Morbidly Obese Women Depends on the Initial Metabolic Status.

BACKGROUND: Adipose tissue (AT) dysfunction in obesity is commonly linked to insulin resistance and promotes the development of metabolic disease. Bariatric surgery (BS) represents an effective strategy to reduce weight and to improve metabolic health in morbidly obese subjects. However, the mechanisms and pathways that are modified in AT in response to BS are not fully understood, and few information is still available as to whether these may vary depending on the metabolic status of obese subjects. METHODS: Abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) samples were obtained from morbidly obese women (n = 18) before and 13.3 ± 0.37 months after BS. Obese women were stratified into two groups: normoglycemic (NG; Glu < 100 mg/dl, HbA1c <5.7 %) or insulin resistant (IR; Glu 100-126 mg/dl, HbA1c 5.7-6.4 %) (n = 9/group). A multi-comparative proteomic analysis was employed to identify differentially regulated SAT proteins by BS and/or the degree of insulin sensitivity. Serum levels of metabolic, inflammatory, and anti-oxidant markers were also analyzed. RESULTS: Before surgery, NG and IR subjects exhibited differences in AT proteins related to inflammation, metabolic processes, the cytoskeleton, and mitochondria. BS caused comparable weight reductions and improved glucose homeostasis in both groups. However, BS caused dissimilar changes in metabolic enzymes, inflammatory markers, cytoskeletal components, mitochondrial proteins, and angiogenesis regulators in NG and IR women. CONCLUSIONS: BS evokes significant molecular rearrangements indicative of improved AT function in morbidly obese women at either low or high metabolic risk, though selective adaptive changes in key cellular processes occur depending on the initial individual's metabolic status.

Resolution of type 2 diabetes and prediabetes following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: medium term results.

PURPOSE: To determine the impact of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) on the resolution of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and Prediabetes (PDM) in obese patients, as well as potential improvements in other comorbidities. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational retrospective study. We studied all patients with T2DM (n= 36) or PDM (n= 44) who underwent LSG in our hospital between years 2009 and 2012. PDM was defined as having at least 2 values of HbA1c between 5.7 and 6.4%. Follow-up period was 1-4 years (mean 17.5 months). T2DM remission criteria were fasting plasma glucose (FPG).

Objetivos: Evaluar la efectividad de la gastroplastia tubular laparoscópica (GTL) en la resolución de la diabetes tipo 2 (DM2), de la prediabetes (PDM) y de otras comorbilidades en pacientes obesos. Material y métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo. Se incluyeron a los pacientes con DM2 (n= 36) o PDM (n= 44) que fueron sometidos a GTL en nuestro hospital entre 2009 y 2012. Se consideró criterio de PDM presentar HbA1c entre 5.7-6.4% en al menos dos ocasiones. Periodo de seguimiento entre 1-4 años (media 17.5 meses). Como criterio de resolución de la DM2 se consideró presentar HbA1c.

Glycemic and lipid control in hospitalized type 2 diabetic patients: evaluation of 2 enteral nutrition formulas (low carbohydrate-high monounsaturated fat vs high carbohydrate).

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetic patients may need enteral nutrition support as part of their treatment. The objective was to compare glycemic and lipid control in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes requiring feeding via nasogastric tube using enteral feedings with either a highcarbohydrate or a high-monounsaturated-fat content. METHODS: This trial included type 2 diabetes patients admitted to the hospital for neurologic disorders or head and neck cancer surgery who received either a low-carbohydrate-high-mono-unsaturated-fat (Glucerna) or a high-carbohydrate diet (Precitene Diabet). Glycemic and lipid control was determined weekly. Safety and gastrointestinal tolerance were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients were randomized and 63 were evaluable according to preestablished protocol criteria. Median duration of therapy was 13 days in both groups. Mean glucose was significantly increased at 7 days of treatment (p = .006) in the Precitene arm, with no significant variations in the Glucerna arm. Mean weekly blood triglycerides levels in the Precitene arm were increased without reaching statistical significance, whereas patients in the Glucerna arm showed a stable trend. Patients in the Precitene arm showed a significantly higher incidence of diarrhea than patients in Glucerna arm (p = .008), whereas the incidence of nausea was smaller in the Precitene arm than in the Glucerna arm (p = .03). CONCLUSIONS: An enteral formula with lower carbohydrate and higher monounsaturated fat (Glucerna) has a neutral effect on glycemic control and lipid metabolism in type 2 diabetic patients compared with a high-carbohydrate and a lower-fat formula (Precitene Diabet).